Chris sent me the list of contacts for the awards we decided to target, as soon as I have an award from Health I'll contact them. One we looked at and rejected was a collaboration between the Oasis Christian Group and AMD, this week I was contacted by Jeremy Thompson from Oasis who I'm hoping to speak to next week, I think it may add an interesting aspect to the project.
I also had a meeting with the project director Jenny Yorke about what she envisaged the "fast-track" process to be. I've made some notes and I really need to go away and think about it properly before I ask the team to contribute and we decide the best way to tackle it. The scope is wider than I thought, though with the time scale of the project I think I may concentrate on certain aspects while hopefully building into the project room for expansion.
- To build a body of knowledge based upon the positive outputs from validations and the outcomes of the models project. In the extraction of good practice from both to form new models perhaps?
- Map outcomes of validations to elearning models would be a bonus not the whole picture.
- Have to have named approaches
- Detail about good practice elements e.g. protocols for response times (these have been done by sciences)
- Far more detailed than the high level of the elearning models project.
- Look at Teaching & Learning strategies, student support, - especially module handbooks, decisions made about using new technologies would be interesting area to look at - e.g. if we are using emerging technologies who makes decisions about their suitability, support etc
- Learning Support are particularly interested in producing a generic module handbook
- If someone does want to use blogs for example who decides what at validation?
- Decide on which areas of validation to focus on.
No comments:
Post a Comment